Wednesday, December 3, 2014

Cloud Computing and Big Data - Two Peas in a Pod?

There have been a multitude of blogs and articles about Cloud Computing and Big Data but usually as individual topics. As the use of cloud computing increases, the processing of Big Data becomes more prominent. Why is that?


 


Figure 1 Ruggedized Server Cloud-In-A-Case System Figure 1
Ruggedized Server Cloud-In-A-Case System


Cloud computing is the latest buzzword for the future of computing. But it is really not a new term. The first acknowledged use of “cloud computing” has been traced to 1996 and Compaq Computer. Their vision was detailed and timely. Not only would all business software move to the web, but what they termed “cloud computing-enabled applications” like consumer file storage would become common (Technology Review 10/11). Of course in 1996 network technology and computer technology was not at the point of being able to implement a lot of the ideas of cloud computing.


 


Fast forward ten years and Amazon.com introduced the Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2), three words that describe expandable computing power located in some other space. In 2006 Amazon released a beta version of EC2 to the public on a first come, first served basis. EC2 went into production in October 2008 when the beta label was removed and EC2 was offered as a supported service by Amazon. Now Amazon cloud and web services are used by not only commercial enterprises but also by government and military users.


 


Said Jeff Bezos at an Amazon shareholder meeting “We’re really focused on what we call infrastructure Web services…Amazon Web Services is focused is on very deep infrastructure. It has the potential to be as big as our retail business. It’s a very large area and right now (and) it’s done in our opinion in a very inefficient way. Whenever something big is done inefficiently that creates an opportunity.”


 


Big data is another term that has a long history. There are several references to the term Big Data but the one that is most referenced is from John Mashey in the mid 1990’s when he was Chief Scientist at Silicon Graphics. An example of his use of the term ‘Big Data’ is available in the public domain from a presentation given at Usenix in 1999 – “Big Data and the Next Wave of Infrastress“.  Mr. Mashey also seems to have developed another word that is appropriate for current times – Infrastress or, Stress on the Infrastructure.


 


The uses of big data are everywhere with such diverse examples as the Library of Congress storing “tweets” for future review and study. As of March 2013 the library has stored 170 billion tweets and was adding 150 million a day. Another example is the military capturing real time video data of an area of interest. One sensor system the military uses is Gorgon Stare – a spherical array of nine cameras attached to an aerial drone. Used as a wide-area surveillance and sensor system Gorgon Stare can generate several terabytes of data per minute. Mounted on a drone with 24 hour loiter capability, the amount of data available is staggering.


 


In order to analyze and present intelligent results to a user, the amount of network bandwidth and computer power would be beyond what is available to the average user. The concept of virtualization has provided a way to integrate the compute part of cloud computing with the storage of massive amounts of data. By locating the compute resource in the cloud, the user is provided with access to a virtual computer that can provide the computing power sized to run the desired application. Chassis Plans wrote an article in COTS Journal about ruggedized virtual access for military applications – “Ruggedized Servers for the Data Centric Military Environment”. In the article, the author describes the type of server needed to access the cloud and big data.


 


Today’s limitation of network access for remote users and limits on local computing resources make the use of the cloud an appropriate technology. By co-locating the data and compute resource in the same area, the best use can be made of the infrastructure and the user can have access to interpreted data on devices such as tablets and smart phones. In other words, without the cloud the use of big data is very limited and without the cloud to store big data data mining applications would not be available. Two peas in a pod.


 


What are the next hurdles? There are several challenges facing users today. The first is developing the applications necessary to process the data. The data is now available, but the algorithms to process the data are not. Beyond the applications the question of security is a major issue. With the latest hacks of both government and private data bases, the issue of encryption and cyber defense are fast becoming strategic to future technology advances and expansion of cloud computing.


 


The big news last week was the hack of Sony Pictures which caused massive damage to their email services and the release of several un-released movies.  Cyber defense is not just a concern for the government and military.



Cloud Computing and Big Data - Two Peas in a Pod?

Monday, November 10, 2014

Linux Servers vs BSD UNIX Systems From the Past

Did we actually accomplish anything on computers with less than gigabytes of memory and terabytes of storage?


 


As a supplier of servers and computer systems for both industrial and military applications, Chassis Plans provides both Windows and Linux based systems. The system shown below is a 2U industrial system with an Intel Core i7 processor, about 83,000 MIPS (2.93GHz) and 32GB of DRAM and 2 TB of rotating or solid state storage media. With a 600w redundant power supply the unit is using much less than 1KW of power.


 


Chassis Plans M2U-20A 2U System Chassis Plans M2U-20A 2U System


 


This 2U system provides an amazing amount of processing power but it also can be supplied with single or dual Intel Xeon processors for more performance. It is a powerful system and, utilizing Linux as an operating system, makes a good server or workstation.


 


Sometimes we forget how far the computer industry has come in the past 30 years. There certainly have been major strides in performance, storage capacity and memory capacity for computer systems. So what did a computer system of 1984 look like in comparison?


 


Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC) VAX 11/780


A good example of the type of system available in 1984 is the Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC) VAX 11/780. From the picture below it is apparent that the 2U form factor is out the window. The basic configuration of the VAX 11/780 was a computer cabinet (5ft X 4ft X 2.5ft) with a three phase power supply and drawing a total of 7 kilowatts. Weight was about 2,000 lbs plus peripherals.  All this for a processor with 1Mips (5 MHz) performance and 128K to 8MB of memory. Yes, that is megabytes, not Gigabytes!  Environmental specs were 50-85 Deg F and 10-40% R.H.


 


DEC VAX 11/780 Computer System DEC VAX 11/780 Computer System


 


Disc drives were extra and were typically 50-150 Mb in size.


 


In 1984 Linux was not available but for a small fee of around $30,000 to Bell labs a version of UNIX and a site license was available. For another fee of $500 a version of BSD 4.1 UNIX that actually worked was available from the University of California at Berkeley. The end result was a multi-user computer system with 4MB of memory that was running UNIX and could be used to support a department of software, hardware and support staff. A pretty big step forward in user computer access at the time.


 


The development of BSD UNIX never stopped and today versions are available under the name of NetBSD (www.netbsd.org) and FreeBSD (www.freebsd.org) as well as others. Linux, of course, is available from several sources as freeware or supported versions from several companies such as Ubuntu (www.ubuntu.com) or RedHat (www.redhat.com).


 


It is interesting to note that significant computer development work was performed using a computer system with 4MB of memory and accessed only by a CRT terminal. In a quote from a 1970’s Bell Lab research paper about the porting of UNIX to the VAX 11/780 – “Work on the C compiler began in mid-December 1977. The hardware arrived on March 3. We held a party on May 19 to celebrate successful multi-user operation of the system” (A UNIX Operating System for the DEC VAX-11/780 Computer, Thomas B. London and John F. Reiser).


 


The operating system, compiler and all applications for the UNIX system were ported in less than six months utilizing a computer system that by today’s standards would not be useful for reading emails.


 


If there is interest in experiencing what it was like to utilize a VAX 11/780 there is a simulator for workstations such as those available from Chassis Plans that emulates most of the minicomputers of the late seventies and early eighties. SIMH (simh.trailing-edge.com) is a freeware program that emulates DEC minicomputers and peripherals using a variety of operating systems. Based on the performance of 2U system shown above, multiple copies of SIMH could be used to emulate several VAX computers on the same machine. The only difference from true VAX 11/780 hardware is that the emulated version runs faster.



Linux Servers vs BSD UNIX Systems From the Past

Monday, November 3, 2014

Sequestration and COTS in 2015 and Beyond

As we come to the end of 2014 the effects of the Sequestration Budget is still with us. The question is what is going to happen going forward? At the annual AUSA convention in mid-October, Army officials presented several concerns about the budget for fiscal year 2015 and beyond.


 


If sequestration budget cuts remain in effect, the US Army will take a $14 billion hit in 2016, jeopardizing modernization programs, Army officials told reporters on Oct. 24. Cuts have already hit unmanned vehicle and aircraft sensor projects. “Since 2011, the Army has cancelled 21 programs, delayed 125 and restructured 124. After dropping the Ground Combat Vehicle, Armed Aerial Scout, Unmanned Ground Vehicle upgrades and the Mounted Soldier System programs, the aviation, communications and ground combat vehicles are now vulnerable” said Brig. Gen. Frank Muth, director of the Army’s Quadrennial Defense Review office.


 


“Ending sequestration is the root of all the issues, and anything else you’re doing is a half-attempt or a Band-Aid or a bridge,” said Maj. Gen. Gary Cheek, the Army’s assistant deputy commanding general for operations, plans and policy.


 


Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel has warned Congress repeatedly that if there is no relief from the requirements of the budget law — which uses a mechanism known as “sequestration” to limit the availability of money — then the U.S. will lose its warfighting edge.  For instance, on February 24 of this year he stated in a press briefing that, “the only way to implement sequestration is to sharply reduce spending on readiness and modernization, which would almost certainly result in a hollow force — one that isn’t ready or capable of fulfilling assigned missions.”


 


Similar concerns are being voiced in the other services and non-war fighter agencies such as the Defense Information Services Agency (DISA). DISA is considering consolidating contracts as means to increase efficiencies and save money, particularly with the possibility of another round of sequestration bearing down on them for fiscal year 2016. The agency is also preparing to reorganize under broader DoD cyber security plans.


 


Looking to the Future


“As you can see we’re changing our organization to be better at preparing ourselves for what we expect to be our future. We’ve seen a lot more teamwork being done with all the services and DISA over the past year and that will continue,” said Maj. Gen. Alan Lynn, DISA vice-director and the agency’s chief procurement officer. “To do that kind of work with so many different services, all with different interests, we’ve really got to work our acquisition plans and make sure we have the requirements right and make sure that we manage everything.”


 


Since the budget control act of 2011, the total DoD budget cuts have totaled about $600 billion. With the addition of projected sequestration-level cuts for FY 2016 through 2021, reductions to planned defense spending for the ten-year period from FY 2012 to 2021 will exceed $1 trillion (Estimated Impacts of Sequestration-Level Funding – FY 2015 Defense Budget, DoD report April 2014).


 


With budget cuts and the focus on cost savings via acquisition planning, the future for commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) products still is the most viable method for developing new electronic systems as well as improving existing platforms. The COTS initiative started by Dr. Perry, former US Secretary of Defense, in 1995 has matured to the point where there is a broad offering of products from scores of vendors that do not require development funds in order to be used on government programs.


 


Figure 1 Ruggedized Server Cloud-In-A-Case System Figure 1
Ruggedized Server Cloud-In-A-Case System


Products such as the COTS server in a transit case provided by Chassis Plans shown in Figure 1 can be used in many different programs without development costs decreasing the time required to qualify and field the final product. The system in Figure 1 is based on industry standards and can be upgraded with higher-performance parts as they become available. This upgradeability will help reduce the long term cost of maintaining and improving the fielded system.


 


Based on data available today the effects of sequestration are going to extend into the next decade and the effects on military programs will be profound. The continued use of COTS products, such as those from Chassis plans, can reduce the cost of new initiatives as well upgrade cost of existing platforms. The end result is that COTS products can continue to help the military be prepared for future threats and changes in technology requirements.



Sequestration and COTS in 2015 and Beyond

Tuesday, September 9, 2014

Leadership in Engineering Scholarship - Winter 2015

Neal Riebel - Courtesy of New Mexico State University

Neal Riebel – Courtesy of New Mexico State University


The Chassis Plans Leadership in Engineering Scholarship is awarded twice each year to a student in either a lower division program or pursuing a Master’s degree or PhD in an engineering field.


 


This is a $1,500 scholarship that can be applied to any school-related expense.


 


Our Fall, 2014, Scholarship was won by Julia Soderstjerna who is enrolled in the UC San Diego Jacobs School of Engineering.  Julia is majoring in Mechanical Engineering.


 


The Chassis Plans’ Leadership in Engineering Scholarship was founded to assist future engineers in pursuing their degree in an effort to continue America’s leadership in innovation.  As an engineering-driven company providing rugged computing solutions to industry and the military, we recognize that today’s engineering students will be the driving force for continued leadership in the future.


 


We ask the applicants to prepare an essay of 1,000 to 1,500 words about one of the following topics:


  • In addition to a solid education, what is the most important trait for tomorrow’s engineers to have?

  • As an engineer, how do you hope to contribute to future society?

  • What do you see as the future of transportation and why?

 


For more information, see http://www.chassis-plans.com/scholarship-engineering-2015-winter.html



Leadership in Engineering Scholarship - Winter 2015

Thursday, August 28, 2014

Chassis Plans Makes Inc 500/5000 List

Inc500For the fifth time, Chassis Plans has been listed on the Inc Magazine 500/5000 list of fastest growing privately held companies in the US.  We’re pretty stoked about this given the economy last year.  Shows our customers continue to trust our capabilities by continuing to place high-value orders with us for rugged military and industrial computer systems and LCD display.


http://www.inc.com/profile/chassis-plans .



Chassis Plans Makes Inc 500/5000 List

Tuesday, August 26, 2014

Chassis Plans Leadership in Engineering Scholarship Finalist

Nick Aerni

Nick Aerni


Here’s the work of another outstanding student who responded to the Leadership in Engineering Scholarship opportunity.


 


Nick Aerni is a Senior studying electrical and computer engineering at the University of Kentucky. An enthusiast for renewable energy development, Nick has participated in four education abroad programs with a renewable energy focus, and will be completing a seventh internship/co-op experience this Fall to become best prepared for a career within the power industry.


 


A native of Kentucky, Nick is working on developing a global understanding of energy and sustainability, and has actively pursued a diverse educational and professional track to reflect the diverse portfolio necessary to correct a deficiency in safe, clean, and reliable power worldwide.


 


Away from school and work Nick has taken large interests in travel and consumer electronics. Primarily, however, he uses his free time for running and playing basketball or soccer whenever possible. He enjoys being an avid sports fan in Cincinnati and at the University of Kentucky.


 


Going forward, Nick intends to complete Masters degrees in Electrical Engineering and Business Administration to develop further technically and prepare for engineering management opportunities.


 


Nick’s truly remarkable essay is available at Chassis-Plans-Scholarship-Essay-Nick-Aerni-Aug-2014.pdf.



Chassis Plans Leadership in Engineering Scholarship Finalist

Thursday, August 21, 2014

Chassis Plans Leadership in Engineering Scholarship Runner-up

Grace Bushnell

Grace Bushnell


We had an overwhelming response to our Leadership in Engineering Scholarship and received many really great essays.  Choosing the winner was very difficult.  A couple of people stood out from the crowd and we’d like to acknowledge these future Engineers.


 


Grace Bushnell is a first year PhD student in Biomedical Engineering at Northwestern University. She received her Bachelor of Science in Biomedical Engineering in 2013 and Master of Science in Biomedical Engineering in 2014. Her research is focused on developing biomaterials for the study and treatment of metastatic cancer. Grace hopes to work as a post-doctoral fellow following her PhD and eventually join academia as a faculty member.


 


Grace’s outstanding essay can be seen at Chassis-Plans-Scholarship-Essay-Grace-Bushnell-Aug-2014.pdf



Chassis Plans Leadership in Engineering Scholarship Runner-up