Tuesday, December 30, 2014

Chassis Plans SPAWAR NAVSSI System Barge Test

60 Lbs of HBX-1 explosive 20 feet from test barge[/caption]

MIL-S-901D – the gold standard of shock testing.


See the video at https://www.youtube.com/user/chassisplans.


Chassis Plans’ rugged military grade 4U M4U20 computer system has been successfully tested to MIL-S-901D Grade A for use in the SPAWAR NAVSSI rack. The test requires 4 shots, or explosions, in the water next to a barge in which the equipment is mounted. Thus this is commonly referred to as the Barge Test. The explosives are 60 pounds of HBX-1 placed 24 feet underwater between 20 and 40 feet from the barge.


Two testing grades are available. Grade A is the equipment must still be functional after the 4 shots. Grade B allows for the equipment to no longer function but no parts can fly off that might endanger persons or nearby equipment.


[caption id=”attachment_794″ align=”alignleft” width=”150″> M4U20 Military Grade 4U Computer System M4U20 Military Grade 4U Computer System


The Chassis Plans M4U20 computer passed the more rigorous Grade A requirement by continuing to function after all 4 shots without any repair or intervention.


The purpose of the test is to simulate Navy ships or submarines being hit with a torpedo, aerial bombardment or hitting a mine. Grade A equipment is necessary for the continued functioning of the ship after such an attack.


It might be noted the M4U system was a standard configuration and was not enhanced in any manner to prepare it for this punishing test.


Chassis Plans continues to support SPAWAR in their efforts to equip America’s war fighters with the most reliable and advanced equipment possible.


See Chassis-Plans.com for additional information.



Chassis Plans SPAWAR NAVSSI System Barge Test

Tuesday, December 23, 2014

2015 Chassis Plans Calendars are Here

Chassis Plans Chassis Plans’ 2015 Industrial Computer Calendar


Announcing the Chassis Plans’ 2015 calendar is here.  These are free to qualified users in the industrial and military computer markets.  Go to www.chassis-plans.com/industrial-computer-calendar.html to request your own copy.


 


This is a beautiful large format 11 x 17-inch work of art that everybody loves.



2015 Chassis Plans Calendars are Here

Monday, December 15, 2014

Big Data: Interesting Facts and Figures

There is a lot of talk in the media about “Big Data.”  Here are some fun facts on the subject:


  • It took from the dawn of civilization to the year 2003 for the world to generate 1.8 zettabytes (10 to the 12th gigabytes) of data. In 2011 it took two days on average to generate the same amount of data.

  • In the year 2011 there were 12 million RFID tags sold worldwide.  That number is projected to be 209 billion by 2021.

  • There are 750 million photos uploaded to Facebook every two days

  • 1/3 of all data will be stored in or pass through the cloud by the year 2020 and will amount to 35 zettabytes of combined data

  • There are almost as may bits of information in the digital universe as there are stars in our real universe.

  • There are over 247 billion e-mail messages sent each day.  Up to 80% of them are spam.

  • 48 hours of video are uploaded to YouTube every minute, resulting in 8 years’ worth of digital content each day

  • The world’s data doubles every two years

  • Oil drilling platforms have 20,000 to 40,000 sensors

  • Twitter processes 7 terabytes of data every day

  • The number of text messages sent and received every day exceeds the total population of the planet

  • Facebook processes 10 terabytes of data every day

  • Decoding the human genome took 10 years to process; now it can be accomplished in one week

  • 571 new websites are created every minute of the day

  • U.S. drone aircraft sent back 24 years with of video footage in 2009

  • Google has over 3 million servers processing over 1.7 trillion searches per year in 2011

 



Big Data: Interesting Facts and Figures

Wednesday, December 3, 2014

Cloud Computing and Big Data - Two Peas in a Pod?

There have been a multitude of blogs and articles about Cloud Computing and Big Data but usually as individual topics. As the use of cloud computing increases, the processing of Big Data becomes more prominent. Why is that?


 


Figure 1 Ruggedized Server Cloud-In-A-Case System Figure 1
Ruggedized Server Cloud-In-A-Case System


Cloud computing is the latest buzzword for the future of computing. But it is really not a new term. The first acknowledged use of “cloud computing” has been traced to 1996 and Compaq Computer. Their vision was detailed and timely. Not only would all business software move to the web, but what they termed “cloud computing-enabled applications” like consumer file storage would become common (Technology Review 10/11). Of course in 1996 network technology and computer technology was not at the point of being able to implement a lot of the ideas of cloud computing.


 


Fast forward ten years and Amazon.com introduced the Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2), three words that describe expandable computing power located in some other space. In 2006 Amazon released a beta version of EC2 to the public on a first come, first served basis. EC2 went into production in October 2008 when the beta label was removed and EC2 was offered as a supported service by Amazon. Now Amazon cloud and web services are used by not only commercial enterprises but also by government and military users.


 


Said Jeff Bezos at an Amazon shareholder meeting “We’re really focused on what we call infrastructure Web services…Amazon Web Services is focused is on very deep infrastructure. It has the potential to be as big as our retail business. It’s a very large area and right now (and) it’s done in our opinion in a very inefficient way. Whenever something big is done inefficiently that creates an opportunity.”


 


Big data is another term that has a long history. There are several references to the term Big Data but the one that is most referenced is from John Mashey in the mid 1990’s when he was Chief Scientist at Silicon Graphics. An example of his use of the term ‘Big Data’ is available in the public domain from a presentation given at Usenix in 1999 – “Big Data and the Next Wave of Infrastress“.  Mr. Mashey also seems to have developed another word that is appropriate for current times – Infrastress or, Stress on the Infrastructure.


 


The uses of big data are everywhere with such diverse examples as the Library of Congress storing “tweets” for future review and study. As of March 2013 the library has stored 170 billion tweets and was adding 150 million a day. Another example is the military capturing real time video data of an area of interest. One sensor system the military uses is Gorgon Stare – a spherical array of nine cameras attached to an aerial drone. Used as a wide-area surveillance and sensor system Gorgon Stare can generate several terabytes of data per minute. Mounted on a drone with 24 hour loiter capability, the amount of data available is staggering.


 


In order to analyze and present intelligent results to a user, the amount of network bandwidth and computer power would be beyond what is available to the average user. The concept of virtualization has provided a way to integrate the compute part of cloud computing with the storage of massive amounts of data. By locating the compute resource in the cloud, the user is provided with access to a virtual computer that can provide the computing power sized to run the desired application. Chassis Plans wrote an article in COTS Journal about ruggedized virtual access for military applications – “Ruggedized Servers for the Data Centric Military Environment”. In the article, the author describes the type of server needed to access the cloud and big data.


 


Today’s limitation of network access for remote users and limits on local computing resources make the use of the cloud an appropriate technology. By co-locating the data and compute resource in the same area, the best use can be made of the infrastructure and the user can have access to interpreted data on devices such as tablets and smart phones. In other words, without the cloud the use of big data is very limited and without the cloud to store big data data mining applications would not be available. Two peas in a pod.


 


What are the next hurdles? There are several challenges facing users today. The first is developing the applications necessary to process the data. The data is now available, but the algorithms to process the data are not. Beyond the applications the question of security is a major issue. With the latest hacks of both government and private data bases, the issue of encryption and cyber defense are fast becoming strategic to future technology advances and expansion of cloud computing.


 


The big news last week was the hack of Sony Pictures which caused massive damage to their email services and the release of several un-released movies.  Cyber defense is not just a concern for the government and military.



Cloud Computing and Big Data - Two Peas in a Pod?

Monday, November 10, 2014

Linux Servers vs BSD UNIX Systems From the Past

Did we actually accomplish anything on computers with less than gigabytes of memory and terabytes of storage?


 


As a supplier of servers and computer systems for both industrial and military applications, Chassis Plans provides both Windows and Linux based systems. The system shown below is a 2U industrial system with an Intel Core i7 processor, about 83,000 MIPS (2.93GHz) and 32GB of DRAM and 2 TB of rotating or solid state storage media. With a 600w redundant power supply the unit is using much less than 1KW of power.


 


Chassis Plans M2U-20A 2U System Chassis Plans M2U-20A 2U System


 


This 2U system provides an amazing amount of processing power but it also can be supplied with single or dual Intel Xeon processors for more performance. It is a powerful system and, utilizing Linux as an operating system, makes a good server or workstation.


 


Sometimes we forget how far the computer industry has come in the past 30 years. There certainly have been major strides in performance, storage capacity and memory capacity for computer systems. So what did a computer system of 1984 look like in comparison?


 


Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC) VAX 11/780


A good example of the type of system available in 1984 is the Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC) VAX 11/780. From the picture below it is apparent that the 2U form factor is out the window. The basic configuration of the VAX 11/780 was a computer cabinet (5ft X 4ft X 2.5ft) with a three phase power supply and drawing a total of 7 kilowatts. Weight was about 2,000 lbs plus peripherals.  All this for a processor with 1Mips (5 MHz) performance and 128K to 8MB of memory. Yes, that is megabytes, not Gigabytes!  Environmental specs were 50-85 Deg F and 10-40% R.H.


 


DEC VAX 11/780 Computer System DEC VAX 11/780 Computer System


 


Disc drives were extra and were typically 50-150 Mb in size.


 


In 1984 Linux was not available but for a small fee of around $30,000 to Bell labs a version of UNIX and a site license was available. For another fee of $500 a version of BSD 4.1 UNIX that actually worked was available from the University of California at Berkeley. The end result was a multi-user computer system with 4MB of memory that was running UNIX and could be used to support a department of software, hardware and support staff. A pretty big step forward in user computer access at the time.


 


The development of BSD UNIX never stopped and today versions are available under the name of NetBSD (www.netbsd.org) and FreeBSD (www.freebsd.org) as well as others. Linux, of course, is available from several sources as freeware or supported versions from several companies such as Ubuntu (www.ubuntu.com) or RedHat (www.redhat.com).


 


It is interesting to note that significant computer development work was performed using a computer system with 4MB of memory and accessed only by a CRT terminal. In a quote from a 1970’s Bell Lab research paper about the porting of UNIX to the VAX 11/780 – “Work on the C compiler began in mid-December 1977. The hardware arrived on March 3. We held a party on May 19 to celebrate successful multi-user operation of the system” (A UNIX Operating System for the DEC VAX-11/780 Computer, Thomas B. London and John F. Reiser).


 


The operating system, compiler and all applications for the UNIX system were ported in less than six months utilizing a computer system that by today’s standards would not be useful for reading emails.


 


If there is interest in experiencing what it was like to utilize a VAX 11/780 there is a simulator for workstations such as those available from Chassis Plans that emulates most of the minicomputers of the late seventies and early eighties. SIMH (simh.trailing-edge.com) is a freeware program that emulates DEC minicomputers and peripherals using a variety of operating systems. Based on the performance of 2U system shown above, multiple copies of SIMH could be used to emulate several VAX computers on the same machine. The only difference from true VAX 11/780 hardware is that the emulated version runs faster.



Linux Servers vs BSD UNIX Systems From the Past

Monday, November 3, 2014

Sequestration and COTS in 2015 and Beyond

As we come to the end of 2014 the effects of the Sequestration Budget is still with us. The question is what is going to happen going forward? At the annual AUSA convention in mid-October, Army officials presented several concerns about the budget for fiscal year 2015 and beyond.


 


If sequestration budget cuts remain in effect, the US Army will take a $14 billion hit in 2016, jeopardizing modernization programs, Army officials told reporters on Oct. 24. Cuts have already hit unmanned vehicle and aircraft sensor projects. “Since 2011, the Army has cancelled 21 programs, delayed 125 and restructured 124. After dropping the Ground Combat Vehicle, Armed Aerial Scout, Unmanned Ground Vehicle upgrades and the Mounted Soldier System programs, the aviation, communications and ground combat vehicles are now vulnerable” said Brig. Gen. Frank Muth, director of the Army’s Quadrennial Defense Review office.


 


“Ending sequestration is the root of all the issues, and anything else you’re doing is a half-attempt or a Band-Aid or a bridge,” said Maj. Gen. Gary Cheek, the Army’s assistant deputy commanding general for operations, plans and policy.


 


Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel has warned Congress repeatedly that if there is no relief from the requirements of the budget law — which uses a mechanism known as “sequestration” to limit the availability of money — then the U.S. will lose its warfighting edge.  For instance, on February 24 of this year he stated in a press briefing that, “the only way to implement sequestration is to sharply reduce spending on readiness and modernization, which would almost certainly result in a hollow force — one that isn’t ready or capable of fulfilling assigned missions.”


 


Similar concerns are being voiced in the other services and non-war fighter agencies such as the Defense Information Services Agency (DISA). DISA is considering consolidating contracts as means to increase efficiencies and save money, particularly with the possibility of another round of sequestration bearing down on them for fiscal year 2016. The agency is also preparing to reorganize under broader DoD cyber security plans.


 


Looking to the Future


“As you can see we’re changing our organization to be better at preparing ourselves for what we expect to be our future. We’ve seen a lot more teamwork being done with all the services and DISA over the past year and that will continue,” said Maj. Gen. Alan Lynn, DISA vice-director and the agency’s chief procurement officer. “To do that kind of work with so many different services, all with different interests, we’ve really got to work our acquisition plans and make sure we have the requirements right and make sure that we manage everything.”


 


Since the budget control act of 2011, the total DoD budget cuts have totaled about $600 billion. With the addition of projected sequestration-level cuts for FY 2016 through 2021, reductions to planned defense spending for the ten-year period from FY 2012 to 2021 will exceed $1 trillion (Estimated Impacts of Sequestration-Level Funding – FY 2015 Defense Budget, DoD report April 2014).


 


With budget cuts and the focus on cost savings via acquisition planning, the future for commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) products still is the most viable method for developing new electronic systems as well as improving existing platforms. The COTS initiative started by Dr. Perry, former US Secretary of Defense, in 1995 has matured to the point where there is a broad offering of products from scores of vendors that do not require development funds in order to be used on government programs.


 


Figure 1 Ruggedized Server Cloud-In-A-Case System Figure 1
Ruggedized Server Cloud-In-A-Case System


Products such as the COTS server in a transit case provided by Chassis Plans shown in Figure 1 can be used in many different programs without development costs decreasing the time required to qualify and field the final product. The system in Figure 1 is based on industry standards and can be upgraded with higher-performance parts as they become available. This upgradeability will help reduce the long term cost of maintaining and improving the fielded system.


 


Based on data available today the effects of sequestration are going to extend into the next decade and the effects on military programs will be profound. The continued use of COTS products, such as those from Chassis plans, can reduce the cost of new initiatives as well upgrade cost of existing platforms. The end result is that COTS products can continue to help the military be prepared for future threats and changes in technology requirements.



Sequestration and COTS in 2015 and Beyond

Tuesday, September 9, 2014

Leadership in Engineering Scholarship - Winter 2015

Neal Riebel - Courtesy of New Mexico State University

Neal Riebel – Courtesy of New Mexico State University


The Chassis Plans Leadership in Engineering Scholarship is awarded twice each year to a student in either a lower division program or pursuing a Master’s degree or PhD in an engineering field.


 


This is a $1,500 scholarship that can be applied to any school-related expense.


 


Our Fall, 2014, Scholarship was won by Julia Soderstjerna who is enrolled in the UC San Diego Jacobs School of Engineering.  Julia is majoring in Mechanical Engineering.


 


The Chassis Plans’ Leadership in Engineering Scholarship was founded to assist future engineers in pursuing their degree in an effort to continue America’s leadership in innovation.  As an engineering-driven company providing rugged computing solutions to industry and the military, we recognize that today’s engineering students will be the driving force for continued leadership in the future.


 


We ask the applicants to prepare an essay of 1,000 to 1,500 words about one of the following topics:


  • In addition to a solid education, what is the most important trait for tomorrow’s engineers to have?

  • As an engineer, how do you hope to contribute to future society?

  • What do you see as the future of transportation and why?

 


For more information, see http://www.chassis-plans.com/scholarship-engineering-2015-winter.html



Leadership in Engineering Scholarship - Winter 2015

Thursday, August 28, 2014

Chassis Plans Makes Inc 500/5000 List

Inc500For the fifth time, Chassis Plans has been listed on the Inc Magazine 500/5000 list of fastest growing privately held companies in the US.  We’re pretty stoked about this given the economy last year.  Shows our customers continue to trust our capabilities by continuing to place high-value orders with us for rugged military and industrial computer systems and LCD display.


http://www.inc.com/profile/chassis-plans .



Chassis Plans Makes Inc 500/5000 List

Tuesday, August 26, 2014

Chassis Plans Leadership in Engineering Scholarship Finalist

Nick Aerni

Nick Aerni


Here’s the work of another outstanding student who responded to the Leadership in Engineering Scholarship opportunity.


 


Nick Aerni is a Senior studying electrical and computer engineering at the University of Kentucky. An enthusiast for renewable energy development, Nick has participated in four education abroad programs with a renewable energy focus, and will be completing a seventh internship/co-op experience this Fall to become best prepared for a career within the power industry.


 


A native of Kentucky, Nick is working on developing a global understanding of energy and sustainability, and has actively pursued a diverse educational and professional track to reflect the diverse portfolio necessary to correct a deficiency in safe, clean, and reliable power worldwide.


 


Away from school and work Nick has taken large interests in travel and consumer electronics. Primarily, however, he uses his free time for running and playing basketball or soccer whenever possible. He enjoys being an avid sports fan in Cincinnati and at the University of Kentucky.


 


Going forward, Nick intends to complete Masters degrees in Electrical Engineering and Business Administration to develop further technically and prepare for engineering management opportunities.


 


Nick’s truly remarkable essay is available at Chassis-Plans-Scholarship-Essay-Nick-Aerni-Aug-2014.pdf.



Chassis Plans Leadership in Engineering Scholarship Finalist

Thursday, August 21, 2014

Chassis Plans Leadership in Engineering Scholarship Runner-up

Grace Bushnell

Grace Bushnell


We had an overwhelming response to our Leadership in Engineering Scholarship and received many really great essays.  Choosing the winner was very difficult.  A couple of people stood out from the crowd and we’d like to acknowledge these future Engineers.


 


Grace Bushnell is a first year PhD student in Biomedical Engineering at Northwestern University. She received her Bachelor of Science in Biomedical Engineering in 2013 and Master of Science in Biomedical Engineering in 2014. Her research is focused on developing biomaterials for the study and treatment of metastatic cancer. Grace hopes to work as a post-doctoral fellow following her PhD and eventually join academia as a faculty member.


 


Grace’s outstanding essay can be seen at Chassis-Plans-Scholarship-Essay-Grace-Bushnell-Aug-2014.pdf



Chassis Plans Leadership in Engineering Scholarship Runner-up

Monday, August 18, 2014

Chassis Plans Awards Leadership in Engineering Scholarship

Chassis Plans 2014 Leadership in Engineering Scholarship Winner - Julia Soderstjerna Chassis Plans 2014 Leadership in Engineering Scholarship Winner – Julia Soderstjerna


We are pleased to announce the award of the 2014 Leadership in Engineering Scholarship today to Julia Soderstjerna.


 


Julia’s winning essay is available here.


 


Julia is a Sophomore at UCSD Jacobs School of Engineering, majoring in Mechanical Engineering. She is an active participant in UCSD’s Engineers for Exploration, and this year she participated in two student-led engineering projects. She worked on the prototyping, mechanical design, 3-D modeling, assembly and deployment of the Tiger Tracker and Intelligent Camera Trap projects. The Tiger Tracker project is currently being utilized to assist in wildlife research at the San Diego Zoo, and the Intelligent Camera Trap is being deployed at the San Dieguito River Valley Preserve.


 


Julia has always been interested in technology, and her decision to study Mechanical Engineering was sparked by joining the FTC Robotics team at Mt. Carmel High School. As the team’s Lead Programmer, she programmed all of the autonomous code for the competition robots. She also participated in the design and troubleshooting of the robots.


 


Currently, Julia is an undergraduate intern at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography under the Ocean Physics Group, where she is working on creating a microconductivity sensor for deployment in future research trips. After graduation, Julia hopes to obtain her master’s degree in Mechanical Engineering, and then to pursue a career in the field.


 


In her free time, Julia enjoys creating 3-D computer animation. One of her animated short films was awarded “Best Animation” at the All-American High School Film Festival in New York City.



Chassis Plans Awards Leadership in Engineering Scholarship

Monday, July 28, 2014

Why Quality Matters

Solder on patrol Cpl. Lucas A. Bankson On Patrol in Afghanistan


Quality matters because this fine young soldier’s life depends on our equipment working when it matters.  Regardless of the environment or abuse, our computer systems and LCDs have to function reliably and flawlessly because his life may depend on that one little thing our computer is doing.  Quality isn’t passing an ISO 9001:2008 audit or getting gold stars for 100% performance.  Quality is us doing our jobs so he can do his.  We fall down on quality and he might die as a result.


 


This is Cpl. Lucas A. Bankson, the nephew of Marc DeMatteo, our company president.  Cpl Bankson is deployed in Afghanistan and this image was taken during an operation in Helmand province.  He is a squad leader assigned to 2nd Platoon, Charlie Company, 1st Battalion, 2nd Marine Regiment, U.S. Marine Corps.


 


Chassis Plans sells to all the prime contractors and branches of the military.  We are ISO 9001:2008 certified and we do get gold stars from our customers for our quality.  Our rugged computer systems are used for persistent surveillance, Joint Range Extension communication systems, C4ISR, air borne radar and communications as well as many other in-theater applications.  Quality is very important to us and we are highly cognizant of the importance of our products working when the going gets tough so Cpl. Bankson and his brothers in arms safely come home.


 


This is why quality matters.



Why Quality Matters

Monday, July 21, 2014

Chassis Plans Recognized by SDBJ’s 2014 Fastest 100 List

Ruggedized Server Cloud In A Case System

Ruggedized Server Cloud In A Case System


For the sixth year, the San Diego Business Journal has recognized Chassis Plans as one of San Diego County’s fastest growing private companies in their 2014 Fast 100 List.  We are also the only computer hardware company to be so recognized.  See Fast 100.


 


Each year, the San Diego Business Journal researches and publishes the List of Fastest Growing Privately Held Companies in the San Diego area – the Fast 100. The ranking is based on a percentage of revenue increase over a three-year period. This groundbreaking research uncovers San Diego’s top emerging growth companies, boasting a cross section of companies based all over the region. To be considered for the Fast 100, companies must be headquartered in the San Diego Business Journal’s coverage area.



Chassis Plans Recognized by SDBJ’s 2014 Fastest 100 List

Sunday, July 13, 2014

Chassis Plans Joins The EDGE Innovation Network

The EDGE Innovation NetworkEDGE Member Chassis Plans, a global leader in rugged computing solutions for harsh environments, has joined the EDGE® Innovation Network, a collaborative, open-environment initiative enabling industry and academia, with government input, to work together to enhance the delivery cycle of new technologies and innovative capabilities to warfighters and first responders.


 


Working with the other members of the Edge Innovation Network, Chassis Plans will improve the delivery cycle of critical hardware and capabilities to Government customers including Homeland Security, Department of Defense, and first responders among others.  General Dynamics C4 Systems is the lead technology partner of the EDGE Innovation Network.  There are 15 EDGE Innovation Centers worldwide and over 450 EDGE members.


 


The EDGE Innovation Network fosters continuous innovation and thought leadership from industry participants, academia and non-profit organizations to accelerate new technologies and innovative capabilities for warfighters and first responders. Find out more at  www.edge-innovation.com.



Chassis Plans Joins The EDGE Innovation Network

Friday, June 13, 2014

Dell Founders Club 50

Dell Founders Club 50

Dell Founders Club 50


Chassis Plans has been named to the Dell Founders Club 50, an exclusive list of companies that Dell has identified as high-growth poised to become major disruptors in their specific industries.  This membership validates Chassis Plans’ year-after-year listing on the Inc 500/5000 and San Diego Business Journal Fast 100 lists.


 


The Founders Club 50 is a two-year program focused on key areas of growth for the member companies. These CEOs have already proven they know how to start and grow a business. Dell leverages some of the best practices and networks from today’s accelerators, VC firms, top startup organizations, and then backs them with the power of one of the world’s largest technology companies.


 


Being a member of this prestigious group brings several advantages to Chassis Plans.  Dell focuses on a few key ares and targets the ones most important to the member company including:


 


  • Technology – Access to consulting resources to plan and architect our growing technology needs to address scale

  • Capital – Dell Innovators Credit Fund – asset based debt financing

  • Marketing/Branding – Inclusion in Dell’s marketing and PR

  • Sales Enablement – explore partnerships and channels that could support or grow Chassis Plans’ sales

  • Networking – Connecting Chassis Plans to partners and customers we need to meet.

 


Members of the Dell Founders Club 50 receive personalized support from Dell team members including access to the latest technology and expertise in the technology field.




Dell Founders Club 50

Friday, June 6, 2014

CPX2-173 Wide Screen 17-Inch Display Released

CPX2-173 Wide Screen Rackmount LCD

CPX2-173 Wide Screen Rackmount LCD


We’ve released and are shipping our new CPX2-173 Wide Screen LCD display.  This is a feature-rich military-grade rackmount LCD display with a high-def 1920 x 1080 LCD in both standard- and high-bright daylight viewable versions.  Of particular note is the display handles SD/DH-SDI video for direct high-res camera input.


 


  • Wide-Screen Hi-Def 1920×1080 Max Resolution

  • Utilizes only 6RU (10.5″)

  • Long Life 17-Inch LCD

  • LED Backlights

  • Hi-Bright Sunlight Viewable Option

  • 16.7 Million Display Colors

  • SD/HD-SDI, DVI-D, aRGB, HDMI, Display Port, HD Component, SD Component, Composite Video Inputs

  • Rugged Military Grade Design

  • Designed to Meet MIL-STD-810G

  • Extended Temperature Operation

  • Rugged 5052-H32 Aluminum Construction

  • Bonded Anti-Reflective Glass Option

  • Bonded ITO EMI Filter Glass Option

  • Two Military Grade Controller Options

  • Picture-In-Picture Option

  • Optional Touch Screen Overlay (RhinoTouch®)

 


Full details are at http://www.chassis-plans.com/Rackmount-Keyboard-Displays/CPX2-173-Rackmount-LCD-Display.htm .



CPX2-173 Wide Screen 17-Inch Display Released

Thursday, June 5, 2014

Ruggedized Servers Revamp Data-Centric Military Environments - COTS Journal

Ruggedized Server Cloud In A Case System

Ruggedized Server Cloud In A Case System


COTS Journal, the premier monthly publication in the military hardware space, published an article written by Chassis Plans covering ruggedized servers in their May, 2014, edition.  See the full article at http://www.cotsjournalonline.com/articles/view/104000.  “By using ruggedized rackmount servers with extended environmental specifications, military system integrators can provide back office capability in the field.”


 


Additional information for the Chassis Plans’ Cloud In A Case VMware Virtualization Server can be found at http://www.chassis-plans.com/cloud-in-a-case.html .



Ruggedized Servers Revamp Data-Centric Military Environments - COTS Journal

Thursday, March 20, 2014

Chassis Plans Scores 100% with Lockheed

LMC Quality Score

LMC Quality Score


Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMC) is one of our larger customers and we are involved in several programs across multiple divisions.  They run a very tight ship regarding quality which includes an on-site review of our quality program and monthly performance reviews.


 


Our latest rolling 12-month quality score is 100%.  Can’t get any better than that.


 


Included in the monthly review are: Part rejects, Floor rejects, Supplier Cause and Corrective Action Requests (SCARs) issued, SCAR response time, and Supplier caused customer escapes. The Delivery rating includes: Parts delivered on time to purchase order contract.


 


This score reflects not only our performance but the performance of all of our vendors.


 



Chassis Plans Scores 100% with Lockheed

Wednesday, March 5, 2014

President Obama"s Defense Budget Requests for 2015

Marine One Landing at White House

Marine One Landing at White House


President Obama submitted his 2015 budget request to Congress yesterday for its consideration.  A budget submission for the Department of Defense and supporting documentation was included.


 


The defense discretionary budget for 2015 is $495.6 billion, similar to the 2014 budget.  Included is an additional $26B called the Opportunity, Growth, and Security Initiative.  Two thirds of the budget at $336.3B pays for current operations.  $159.3B is allocated to modernization and recapitalization.


 


Included in the budget request are:


* $7.7 billion for special operations, a 10 percent increase over this year’s funding

* $7.5 billion for the Missile Defense Agency and $5.1 billion for cyber operations

* 26 F-35As, six F-35Bs, and two F-35Cs  in 2015 with a total of 343 Joint Strike Fighters over the five-year Future Years Defense Program (FYDP)

* a 288 ship Navy in 2014 which is proposed to grow to about 309 ships over the FYDP

* a 20 percent cut in headquarters operating budgets

* a Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) round proposed for fiscal year 2017

* funding for 59 Air Force combat-coded air squadrons

* $900 million in funding for the Long Range Strike Bomber in 2015 and $11.4 billion for it over the FYDP

* seven KC-46 Tankers in FY 2015 and 69 aircraft over the FYDP

* $1 billion over the FYDP for a next-generation jet engine

* two Virginia-class submarines and two DDG-51 guided-missile destroyers per year over the FYDP

* three Littoral Combat Ships in 2015 and 14 total over the FYDP

* a Marine Corps end strength of 182,700 in 2015

* 32 Active Army brigade combat teams and 28 Army National Guard brigade combat teams

* proposed adjustments to military compensation and healthcare benefit reforms


 


Additionally, the budget request for fiscal years 2016 through 2019 exceed the current caps for those years by approximately $115B.



President Obama"s Defense Budget Requests for 2015

Monday, March 3, 2014

Passed our ISO 9001:2008 Confirmation Audit

This most recent ISO 9001:208 audit was a re-certification where the auditing organization (registrar International Standards Authority Inc.) reviewed Chassis Plans’ quality plan to half of the ISO 9001:2008 standard.  The auditor felt our core processes are sound and he was generous in his praise for our systems and team.


 


The next audit is in November and is a full re-certification where all elements of the standard will be audited.



 


Periodic surveillance audits are a requirement for maintaining ISO 9001:2008 registration.   External surveillance audits verify that the organization has an effective quality management system that meets all the requirements of the internationally recognized ISO 9001:2008 standard.




Passed our ISO 9001:2008 Confirmation Audit

Thursday, February 27, 2014

Corporate Overview Video

Just released a short video overview of what Chassis Plans can offer our industrial and military computer and LCD customers.


http://youtu.be/0y360FLNDH4



Corporate Overview Video

Friday, February 14, 2014

Rugged Computer Truck Torture Test

Desert Truck Torture Test of Rugged Computer

Desert Truck Torture Test of Rugged Computer


Our new rugged computer and LCD display capability video is up on Youtube at http://youtu.be/dFlWlQmSJMo.


 


We installed one of our rugged M2U military-grade computers and rugged 1U CCX rackmount LCD keyboard units in an ECS Loadmaster transit case along with an Intellipower UPS and took the system to the desert for some rough and tumble torture.  See the video for how it performed after bouncing around in the back of the truck in the hot stink’n desert.



Rugged Computer Truck Torture Test

Monday, January 27, 2014

Mil-Std-810G - Part 9 (Humidity)

Hot Humid JungleThis is part 9 of a series delving into the intricacies of Mil-Std-810G.


 


810G covers humidity in Method 507.5.  This method comprises 21 pages.


 


The purpose of Method 507.5 is to determine the resistance of material to the effects of a warm, humid environment.  It is applicable to material that is likely to be stored or deployed in areas in which high levels of humidity occur.   The essence of 507.5 is hot and humid.  Effects on electronics can include break down of insulators as they absorb moisture or condensation when a cold object is brought into contact with a warmer humid environment.


 


The method may not reproduce all the humidity effects associated with the natural environment nor is this method applicable to low humidity situations.


 


There is not specific method that addresses low humidity.  However, for completeness, low humidity exposure should be considered.  The usual side effect of low humidity is static electricity build-up and subsequent discharge causing spurious operation or material damage to sensitive electronic devices.  MIL-HDBK-263B is the reference for Electrostatic Discharge Control.


 


Warm, humid conditions can occur year-round in tropical areas, seasonally in mid-latitude areas and in material subject to changes in pressure, temperature, and relative humidity.  Material enclosed in non-operating vehicles can experience high internal temperature and humidity conditions.


 


Specifically, this method does not address:


  • Condensation resulting from changes of pressure and temperature for airborne or ground materiel.

  • Condensation resulting from black-body radiation (e.g., night sky effects).

  • Synergistic effects of solar radiation, humidity, or condensation combined with biological and chemical contaminants.

  • Liquid water trapped within materiel or packages and retained for significant periods.

  • This method is not intended for evaluating the internal elements of a hermetically sealed assembly since such materiel is air-tight.

 


Method 520.3 should be considered in conjunction with Method 507.5 to explore the synergistic effects of temperature, humidity and altitude.


 


The effects of high humidity can include:


 


a. Surface effects, such as:


  1. Oxidation and/or galvanic corrosion of metals.

  2. Increased chemical reactions.

  3. Chemical or electrochemical breakdown of organic and inorganic surface coatings.

  4. Interaction of surface moisture with deposits from external sources to produce a corrosive film.

  5. Changes in friction coefficients, resulting in binding or sticking.

 


b. Changes in material properties, such as:


  1. Swelling of materials due to sorption effects.

  2. Other changes in properties.

    (a) Loss of physical strength.

    (b) Electrical and thermal insulating characteristics.

    (c) De-lamination of composite materials.

    (d) Change in elasticity or plasticity.

    (e) Degradation of hygroscopic materials.

    (f) Degradation of explosives and propellants by absorption.

    (g) Degradation of optical element image transmission quality.

    (h) Degradation of lubricants.

 


c. Condensation and free water, such as:


  1. Electrical short circuits.

  2. Fogging of optical surfaces

  3. Changes in thermal transfer characteristics.

 


In addition to “Natural”, Method 507.5 provides for two Procedures: Induced and Aggravated.  Natural simulates a natural environment.  Induced simulates a natural environment for storage and transit.  Aggravated exposes the test item to more extreme temperature and humidity levels than those found in nature but for shorter durations.  The Natural test criteria was selected to mimic Majuro, Marshall Islands with a temperature range of 88 to 105 degrees F. and relative humidity (RH) of 59% to 88% for the Hot Humid test.  Cycle B2 (High RH) provides for lower temperatures but RH up to 100%


 


The test duration is recommended to be a minimum of 45 cycles for non-hazardous materials to 180 days for Induced testing for hazardous material.  Hazardous materials are those in which a failure may cause damage to adjacent material or injury or death to a user.  The purpose of the higher cycle counts is to establish confidence in the testing.



Mil-Std-810G - Part 9 (Humidity)

Tuesday, January 14, 2014

Why go to a Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI)?

Traditional desktop PCs are being replaced in many installations by new Thin/Zero Client Workstations and Data Center Servers running virtual instances of application software.  With the pervasiveness of Gigabit Ethernet the user experience using this technology has been vastly improved.  This has a number of benefits to the corporation in the form of:


 


  1. Increased Security as the workstation clients are not running the application software directly, nor do they store the data itself.  The applications run on the server and the data is stored in managed mass storage. Only Keystrokes and screen refreshes are transmitted over the internal network.

  2. Protection against cyber-attacks as the clients are connected to a managed internal network with central auditing, not directly to the Internet.

  3. Decreased IT support as the software applications are standardized on the server so that all users are on the same version which also leads to increased collaboration on team projects.

  4. The ability to block transfer of data from the data center to the client for offloading to a USB stick or other mass storage device.

 


Because of the increased security aspects of this technology, in light of recent data disclosures and cyber attacks, the Department of Defense is actively pursuing a program to replace virtually all their “fat” PC systems with Thin or Zero Clients.  The Air Force alone is planning on replacing 1.2 million PCs with thin clients in 2014.


 


Now, let’s examine the differences between Thin Clients and true Zero Clients.  Both are small form factor and are typically attached to the back of the display monitor, freeing up desk space.  They are also fairly simple to install, not requiring the massive task of loading all the allocation software during the initial installation.  They are also very low power (<10 Watts) and fan-less which provides for a more conducive work environment. There are a number of differences between the two and they are worth noting.


 


Thin Clients are end point devices with some type of skinny, locked down Operating System such as Linux or Windows Embedded and is typically stored in Flash Memory.  They use more traditional hardware such as CPU boards and Graphic cards and run such applications as browsers, e-mail clients and PDF viewers.  The application is rendered at the terminal and provides for user interaction with the program running on the server.  This makes it almost impossible to get a virus or other malware.  Thin clients are more flexible as they offer much more peripheral support since they are configurable and ideally suited for multi-protocol environments.


 


Zero clients do not have an Operating System, rather a specifically designed processor that runs a specific protocol.  The image is rendered on the host server and only the raw pixels and keystrokes are transmitted over the network.  This reduces the bandwidth required on the network as dedicated hardware Codecs on the host compress the pixel data before sending it to the client.  This offers exceptional video performance but is less flexible as it cannot support various protocols.  They also rarely require any software updates/patches and are completely immune to viruses.


 


In summary, this technology provides for a much more secure environment protecting the data and preventing attacks from viruses, malware and keystroke loggers as well as preventing data theft and corruption.  The first step on deciding between thin and zero clients really rests in the requirements of the network and the connection you prefer with your end uses.


 


Chassis Plans can provide ruggedized Thin/Zero Clients for use in harsh environments.


 


virtual-machine-network


By Erica Sullivan Chassis Plans www.chassis-plans.com



Why go to a Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI)?

Monday, January 13, 2014

Mil-Std-810G – Part 8 (Rain)

f18-in-rainThis is part 8 of a series delving into the intricacies of Mil-Std-810G.


 


810G covers rain exposure in Method 506.5. This method comprises 11 pages. The purpose of Method 506.5 is to help determine effects of rain, water spray or dripping water:


  •  The effectiveness of protective covers, cases, and seals in preventing the penetration of water into the materiel.

  • The capability of the materiel to satisfy its performance requirements during and after exposure to water.

  • Any physical deterioration of the materiel caused by the rain.

  • The effectiveness of any water removal system.

  • The effectiveness of protection offered to a packaged materiel.

 


Method 512.5 covers immersion and is considered a more stringent test than 506.5. If the material configuration is the same as when tested for 512.5, 506.5 testing is redundant.


 


Limitations to this section include:


  • The method is not intended to examine rain erosion effects such as radomes, helicopter blade leading edges, etc.

  • It may be difficult to determine rain effects on electromagnetic radiation and propagation because of the size of the required facility.

  • Determining adequacy of aircraft windshield rain removal.

  • Does not address pressure washers or decontamination devices.

  • Effects of extended periods of exposure to rain or light condensation drip rates caused by an overhead surface with pooling water.

 


Method 506.5 provides three procedures:


  • Procedure I – Rain and blowing rain. Applicable to material that will be deployed out-of-doors.

  • Procedure II – Exaggerated. For use for large objects that may not fit in a chamber. Uses water spray under pressure from a nozzle.

  • Procedure III – Drip. Appropriate when material is normally protected from rain but may be exposed to falling water from upper surfaces.

 


As with all of Mil-Std-810G, the test methods are intended to simulate real world conditions. For example, it may be advantageous to start the test with the tested item warmer (10°C) than the “rain”. The “rain” will cause a lower temperature and subsequent lower pressure within the tested equipment which may draw in water revealing a possible failure point.


 


While rainfall rates around the world vary, and it may be appropriate to mimic those higher rates, in general, a rate of 4 in/hr is not an uncommon occurrence and will provide a reasonable degree of confidence.


 


Wind is also a factor and provision should be made to provide a simulated velocity of at least 40mph. Higher velocities may be appropriate depending on the intended environment. The item under test should be oriented to maximize potential rain penetration.


 


For Procedure I (rain and blowing rain), the test duration should be at least 30 minutes per surface. Rotate the item under test for each surface to be exposed to the wind.


 


Chassis Plans has engineered and produced rugged enclosures for exterior environments.


 


By David Lippincott Chassis Plans www.chassis-plans.com



Mil-Std-810G – Part 8 (Rain)

Sunday, January 12, 2014

Mil-Std-810G – Part 7 (Solar Radiation - Sunshine)

humvee-in-desertThis is part 7 of a series delving into the intricacies of Mil-Std-810G.


 


810G covers Solar Radiation in 505.5 and serves two purposes:


  1. To determine heating effects from sunshine impinging directly on equipment (Procedure I).

  2. To help identify material degradation from sunshine (Procedure II).

 


Mil-Std-810G, Method 505.5, is a rather complicated section at 15 pages with three Annexes (A – Detailed Guidance on Solar Radiation Testing), (B – Instrumentation Installation, Placement and Guidance), (C – Guidance on Tables and Figures) at 15 additional pages combined.


 


Of primary concern to users of computers, the heating effects of solar radiation are more important than material degradation.  Computers are generally manufactured with metal enclosures.  On the other hand, LCDs may suffer from both heating effects and material degradation.  Coatings may degrade somewhat with color changes but the impact of plastic becoming brittle, for example, does not apply to a computer.  A computer painted black sitting outside will become very hot with the subsequent impact on keeping the internal components within operating temperature specifications.


 


The maximum surface and internal temperatures attained by materiel will depend on:


 


  • the temperature of the ambient air.

  • the intensity of radiation.

  • the air velocity.

  • the duration of exposure.

  • the  thermal  properties  of  the  materiel  itself,  e.g.,  surface  reflectance,  size  and  shape,  thermal conductance, and specific heat.

 


Materiel can attain temperatures in excess of 60°C if fully exposed to solar radiation in an ambient temperature as low as 35 to 40°C.  Paint color and composition can have a major impact on surface temperature.


 


810G Method 501.5 (High Temperature) mentions Method 505.5 as a factor to consider (Aggravated solar) when determining effects of high temperature.  In addition, Method 503.5 (Temperature Shock) also references 505.5 in section 2.3.1 for ‘Climatic Conditions’.


 


As you can imagine, 505.5 specifies “Use this Method to evaluate material likely to be exposed to solar radiation during its life cycle in the open in hot climates”.


 


The impact of solar radiation heating effects include:


 


  • Jamming or loosening of moving parts.

  • Weakening of solder joints and glued parts.

  • Changes in strength and elasticity.

  • Loss of calibration or malfunction of linkage devices.

  • Loss of seal integrity.

  • Changes in electrical or electronic components.

  • Premature actuation of electrical contacts.

  • Changes in characteristics of elastomers and polymers.

  • Blistering, peeling, and de-lamination of paints, composites, and surface laminates applied with adhesives such as radar absorbent material (RAM).

  • Softening of potting compounds.

  • Pressure variations.

  • Sweating of composite materials and explosives.

  • Difficulty in handling.

 


Material effects of solar radiation, primarily from UV exposure, include:


 


  • Fading of fabric and plastic color.

  • Checking, chalking, and fading of paints.

  • Deterioration of natural and synthetic elastomers and polymers through photochemical reactions initiated by shorter wavelength radiation. (High strength polymers such as Kevlar are noticeably affected by the visible spectrum. Deterioration and loss of strength can be driven by breakage of high-order bonds (such as pi and sigma bonds existing in carbon chain polymers) by radiation exposure.)

 


Testing is performed in a chamber with a bank of full-spectrum lamps mimicking the sun’s light and heat output.  A maximum irradiance intensity of 1120W/m2 is provided and uniform across the top surface within 10 percent of the desired value.  The Method outlines several scenarios for lamp selection and operation to give the desired results.


 


The ability to vary the lamp output to mimic diurnal variation in solar radiation should be provided for non-static testing.  Where only thermal effects are considered, infrared lamps may be used but realize that coatings and filters on the test item may respond differently to those wavelengths versus sunlight.  As a side note, infrared account for 42.1% (471.5 W/m2) of the sun’s total irradiance


 


For Procedure I (temperature), for worldwide deployment, a peak chamber temperature of 120° F is provided along with airflow of 300 to 600 ft/min to mimic naturally occurring winds.  Generally, an airflow of as little as 200 ft/min can cause a reduction in temperature rise of over 20 percent as compared to still air.  If the item is shielded from the wind in the operating environment, then no airflow would be provided during test.  Maintaining the proper chamber temperature can be challenging as the lamps themselves will generate considerable heat and the unit under test will also be warming the air.  Thus, cooling the chamber may be more problematic versus heating it.


 


Humidity is generally not a concern unless the material under test is known to be sensitive to moisture.


 


The test item should be clean while being tested.  That being said, in many parts of the world, dust and dirt are prevalent and should be considered when planning the testing.  Dust and other surface contamination may significantly change the absorption characteristics of irradiated surfaces.


 


Testing for thermal effects should be performed with the test item in a mode that generates the most heat.


 


Spectral distribution changes with the anticipated operational altitude.  There is more damaging UV radiation at higher altitudes which should be considered.  For example, a long duration high altitude UAV manufactured with composite wings would be tested for that environment looking for material degradation in the wings which may cause structure failure.


 


As with other 810G Methods, Method 505.5 is a general outline and it is left to the end user to create a test plan to align the test with the anticipated environment.  An item in the middle of an asphalt parking lot in Phoenix would be tested differently than an item on a car dash in Anchorage.  The tests should replicate the intended environment.


 


The tests can be performed mimicking the diurnal cycle (24 hours with variable lamp output and variable chamber temperature) or can be steady state (20 hours with the lamps on and 4 hours off).  Repeat the cycle the number of times outlined in the test plan.


 


Chassis Plans has engineered rugged industrial computers for deployment in exposed locations in high-temperature environments and can assist with your project.


 


by David Lippincott Chassis Plans www.chassis-plans.com



Mil-Std-810G – Part 7 (Solar Radiation - Sunshine)

Test Post from Chassis Plans Rackmount Computer Blog

Test Post from Chassis Plans Rackmount Computer Blog http://www.chassis-plans.com/blog